Maintenance notice: Some features that submit or update information are temporarily disabled while we migrate the website. You can continue browsing normally. Thank you for your understanding.
That's good to hear, just an inquisitive thought.
I wonder what people deem as an adequate number of interviews. (By no means is the following meant to single out Bone4Brains.) I worked with a resident who limited himself to 10. His reasoning was that if you had to go down that far on your rank list you probably weren't getting in anywhere. At first I thought this was quite the ballsy move and wouldn't have considered it myself, but the more I think about it the more I agree with him. We all look at "charting the outcomes" and see the great correlation with possibility of matching if one has 10+ interviews, but as a friend pointed out, the correlation isn't that the 10+ interviews grant you some greater advantage, but those who are given that many offers are generally good applicants.
One piece of information I would like to see made available is a breakdown of how far down people go on their rank lists. How many people match to numbers 10, 11, 12...?
Now I'm mostly just "thinking outloud" because I'm starting to get a little fed up waiting for my remaining programs(most of which are the ones I'd really love to have a chance at) and need to release some nervous energy. What are your thoughts?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Yeah but I could have interviewed at 10 places and there are still 5 places left that I'm scheduled to interview at all which are solid and may be the top 5 on my final rank-list. With that said you shouldn't stop at 10 interviews [barring the statistics reasoning] if you think that your other upcoming interviews may be places you would rank high.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Sims, I completely agree with your thoughts in that situation. If you've already gone on 10, but have five more that you're really looking forward to then definitely go to all of those. You can't sell yourself short on your dream spots.
Obviously you'd like to give a program as much notice of a cancellation as you can, but how short of notice is too short? Say you just get an interview for a top choice and would like to cancel a different interview in turn. How short of notice is too short to where you now consider not cancelling the interview just to avoid being considered a jerk? I'm not sure I'm getting my thought across very well. (Of course if they're on the same day you'll cancel no matter what, but say they're a day or two apart so it'd be inconvenient to go to both but you could do it, or you just don't want to have to do both.) I would think a program should always give people the option of coming for a vacated interview spot, even if it's two days away.
Doubledown, I wouldn't consider cancelling just because I think I'll get those better interviews, that's just a little too risky for me. So that brings me back to the above question. When would you be too embarrassed to cancel an interview if you could make both the newer, more desirable interview and the older, less desirable interview?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Doubledown, I wouldn't consider cancelling just because I think I'll get those better interviews, that's just a little too risky for me.
So that brings me back to the above question. When would you be too embarrassed to cancel an interview if you could make both the newer, more desirable interview and the older, less desirable interview?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Improving orthopaedic care, education and research using Internet technologies