RESULTS: None of the analyses revealed statistically significant differences between the groups for any of the parameters analyzed in any volume of interest. For example, the mean bone volume fraction of the defect, as measured by micro-computed tomography, was 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 - 0.68) for DBM hydrated with normal saline and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.40 - 0.65) for DBM hydrated with PRP, compared to 0.53 (95% CI, 0.45 - 0.61) and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.44 - 0.64) for the internal controls, respectively (p >0.05).
CONCLUSION: In contrast to our hypotheses, no beneficial treatment effect of DBM with or without PRP was found for OCDs of the caprine talus.

PMID: 23896314 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Read more... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23896314?dopt=Abstract