rotation in the normal knee (p < 0.05). Seven patients (70 %) showed greater peak rotational velocity in their injured knee, and three had no difference between the knees (p < 0.05). Correlations of rotation and rotational velocity with clinical pivot shift grade were weak (r (2) = 0.09 and 0.19, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Foot gyroscope measurements did not correctly identify the injured limb in all patients. Peak rotational velocity during the reduction event was a better indicator of ACL deficiency than the integrated rotation. If this technology is to be more useful clinically, gyroscope data may have to be combined with accelerometer data, perhaps with sensors mounted on both the tibia and femur.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic case-control study, Level III.

PMID: 23884298 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Read more... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23884298?dopt=Abstract