relative to the tibia.
RESULTS: Patients having a normal axial rotation achieved greater weightbearing knee flexion than those with reverse axial rotation (115° versus 109°, p = 0.02). Additionally, patients with greater than 3° of normal axial rotation at maximum flexion had more flexion than those with less than 3° of normal axial rotation at ending flexion (115° versus 107°, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings show reverse axial rotation and a smaller magnitude of normal axial rotation reduce weightbearing knee flexion. This is likely the result of increased posterior movement of the lateral condyle and is an important consideration in future implant designs.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PMID: 23893359 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Read more... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23893359?dopt=Abstract