{"id":5465,"date":"2025-07-01T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-07-01T09:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.orthogate.org\/press\/uncategorized\/scaphoid-fracture-diagnosis-and-management\/"},"modified":"2025-07-01T13:25:00","modified_gmt":"2025-07-01T13:25:00","slug":"scaphoid-fracture-diagnosis-and-management","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.orthogate.org\/press\/deep-research\/hand-upper-extremity-restoring-function-and-dexterity\/scaphoid-fracture-diagnosis-and-management\/","title":{"rendered":"Scaphoid Fracture Diagnosis and Management"},"content":{"rendered":"

Scaphoid Fracture: Diagnosis, Management, and the Importance of Prompt Treatment<\/b> <\/span><\/span><\/h1>\n\n

<\/p>\n

Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal bone fractures, representing 60-70% of all carpal bone fractures and 2-7% of all fractures<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>. In the United States, the incidence rate is 1.47 per 100,000 person-years<\/span>2<\/sup><\/span>. They typically occur in young, active individuals, with a higher incidence in males<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>. These fractures are often missed during initial clinical and radiographic examinations, potentially leading to misdiagnosis as a simple wrist sprain<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>. This misdiagnosis can have significant consequences, as the risk of nonunion is high, ranging from 14% to 50% in displaced fractures<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>. If left untreated, nonunion can lead to complications such as arthritis, deformity, and instability, which invariably develop within five years, resulting in significant disability and long-term morbidity<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the diagnosis and management of scaphoid fractures, emphasizing the risk of nonunion and the importance of prompt treatment.<\/span><\/p>\n

Anatomy and Mechanism of Injury<\/b> <\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n\n

The scaphoid is the largest of the eight carpal bones, located on the thumb side of the wrist<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>. It plays a crucial role in wrist stability and motion. The blood supply to the scaphoid predominantly originates from the dorsal carpal branch of the radial artery, entering the bone distally and flowing retrograde towards the proximal pole<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>. This unique blood supply pattern makes the proximal pole particularly vulnerable to avascular necrosis (AVN) when a fracture occurs.<\/span><\/p>\n

The most common mechanism of injury is a fall onto an outstretched hand (FOOSH), with the wrist in hyperextension and radial deviation<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>. This forceful impact causes the scaphoid to compress against the dorsal rim of the radius, leading to a fracture. Other causes include contact sports and road traffic accidents<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Types of Scaphoid Fractures<\/b> <\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n\n

Scaphoid fractures are classified based on various factors, including location, stability, and fracture pattern. The following table summarizes the three main classification systems:<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Classification System<\/b> <\/span><\/th>\n Fracture Type<\/b> <\/span><\/th>\n Description<\/b> <\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Mayo Classification<\/span> 3<\/sup><\/span><\/td>\nMiddle third fractures (70%)<\/span><\/td>\nOccur at the waist of the scaphoid<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDistal third fractures (20%)<\/span><\/td>\nInvolve the distal pole, including the tubercle and articular surface. Distal pole fractures are further classified by the Prosser classification into: Type I (tuberosity fractures), Type II (distal intra-articular fractures), and Type III (osteochondral fractures)<\/span>4<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nProximal third fractures (10%)<\/span><\/td>\nAffect the proximal pole, which has a limited blood supply and is prone to AVN<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Herbert Classification<\/span> 5<\/sup><\/span><\/td>\nType A: Stable, acute fractures<\/span><\/td>\nInclude tubercle fractures (A1) and incomplete waist fractures (A2)<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nType B: Unstable, acute fractures<\/span><\/td>\nInclude distal oblique fractures (B1), complete waist fractures (B2), proximal pole fractures (B3), transscaphoid perilunate dislocation fractures (B4), and comminuted fractures (B5)<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nType C: Delayed union<\/span><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nType D: Established nonunions<\/span><\/td>\nCan be further classified as fibrous (D1) or sclerotic (D2)<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Russe Classification<\/span> 6<\/sup><\/span><\/td>\nType I<\/span><\/td>\nHorizontal oblique fracture line<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nType II<\/span><\/td>\nTransverse fracture line<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nType III<\/span><\/td>\nVertical oblique fracture line<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

It’s important to note the relationship between fracture location and the risk of AVN and nonunion. Proximal pole fractures, due to their precarious blood supply, are particularly susceptible to these complications<\/span>4<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Diagnosis<\/b> <\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n\n

Early and accurate diagnosis of scaphoid fractures is crucial for preventing nonunion and long-term complications. Misdiagnosis or delayed treatment can significantly increase the risk of nonunion and associated problems<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>. However, diagnosis can be challenging due to the often subtle nature of these fractures.<\/span><\/p>\n

Clinical Presentation<\/b> <\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n\n

Patients with scaphoid fractures typically present with wrist pain following a fall onto an outstretched hand<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>. The pain is often localized to the radial side of the wrist and exacerbated by movement<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>. Symptoms often include:<\/span> 1<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Pain<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Swelling<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. Limited range of motion<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Tenderness is usually present in specific locations depending on the fracture location:<\/span> 1<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Anatomical snuffbox for waist fractures<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. Volar prominence at the distal wrist for distal pole fractures<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. Distal to Lister’s tubercle for proximal pole fractures<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Imaging Techniques<\/b> <\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n\n

      Several imaging techniques are used in the diagnosis of scaphoid fractures:<\/span><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. X-rays:<\/b> <\/span> The initial radiographic evaluation includes a dedicated scaphoid series with four projections: posteroanterior (PA), lateral, semi-pronated oblique, and scaphoid views<\/span>8<\/sup><\/span>. However, X-rays may miss up to 20% of fractures in the acute setting<\/span>8<\/sup><\/span>. If initial X-rays are negative but clinical suspicion remains high, repeat X-rays after 7-10 days or advanced imaging is recommended<\/span>8<\/sup><\/span>. It’s important to note that a scaphoid fracture may not show up on initial X-rays, and follow-up X-rays after 2-3 weeks may be necessary<\/span>9<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. CT scan:<\/b> <\/span> CT scans are useful when plain films are normal or inconclusive<\/span>8<\/sup><\/span>. They provide detailed images of the bone and can detect some fractures with minimal displacement<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>. CT is also helpful for staging fractures, assessing bone union, and evaluating carpal instability<\/span>8<\/sup><\/span>. CT scans have a reported sensitivity of 89-90% and a specificity of 85-100%<\/span>10<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. MRI:<\/b> <\/span> MRI is considered the most sensitive imaging modality for detecting scaphoid fractures, especially occult fractures not visible on X-rays<\/span>11<\/sup><\/span>. It can also assess the vascularity of the proximal pole, which is crucial for determining treatment and prognosis<\/span>11<\/sup><\/span>. The American College of Radiology (ACR) recommends MRI as the best second-line investigation for scaphoid fractures<\/span>11<\/sup><\/span>. Early MRI has been shown to have advantages, including reduced immobilization time and a faster return to work<\/span>11<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. Bone scan:<\/b> <\/span> Bone scans are highly sensitive but less specific than MRI<\/span>8<\/sup><\/span>. They are usually reserved for patients with persistent pain despite normal serial plain films<\/span>8<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n
      5. Sonography:<\/b> <\/span> While not as commonly used, sonography can also be used in the diagnosis of scaphoid fractures. It can detect cortical disruptions, providing evidence of a fracture<\/span>8<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Management<\/b> <\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n\n

        The management of scaphoid fractures depends on various factors, including fracture location, displacement, stability, and patient factors. Treatment options can be broadly categorized as non-surgical and surgical.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Non-surgical Treatment<\/b> <\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n\n

        Non-surgical treatment is typically reserved for stable, non-displaced fractures<\/span>13<\/sup><\/span>. This involves immobilization with a cast or splint for a period of 4 to 12 weeks, depending on the fracture location<\/span>13<\/sup><\/span>. Cast immobilization promotes natural healing by stabilizing the fractured bone and restricting movement<\/span>14<\/sup><\/span>. Different types of casts are used, including:<\/span> 13<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Forearm cast with thumb spica<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. Above-elbow cast<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          The type of cast and duration of immobilization vary depending on the fracture location and individual patient needs<\/span>13<\/sup><\/span>. One study showed that a supportive bandage, compared to a below-elbow cast, decreased immobilization time and absence from work without negatively impacting fracture healing<\/span>15<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Surgical Treatment<\/b> <\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n\n

          Surgical treatment<\/span> 1<\/sup><\/span> is often recommended for:<\/span><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. Unstable fractures<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. Displaced fractures<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. Proximal pole fractures<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. Fractures with associated carpal instability<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            The goal of surgery is to achieve anatomical reduction and stable fixation of the fracture, promoting healing and preventing nonunion<\/span>16<\/sup><\/span>. Surgical options include:<\/span><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Percutaneous screw fixation:<\/b> <\/span> This minimally invasive technique involves inserting a screw across the fracture site through a small incision<\/span>4<\/sup><\/span>. It is often preferred for less displaced fractures.<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF):<\/b> <\/span> This involves making an incision to directly visualize and reduce the fracture, followed by fixation with screws or plates<\/span>4<\/sup><\/span>. It is typically used for more complex or displaced fractures.<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. Bone grafting:<\/b> <\/span> Bone grafting may be necessary for nonunions or fractures with AVN<\/span>16<\/sup><\/span>. It involves transplanting healthy bone tissue to the fracture site to stimulate healing.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Risk of Nonunion<\/b> <\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n\n

              Nonunion is a significant complication of scaphoid fractures, occurring when the fractured bone fails to heal<\/span>4<\/sup><\/span>. Several factors contribute to the risk of nonunion, including:<\/span><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. Fracture location:<\/b> <\/span> Proximal pole fractures have the highest risk of nonunion due to their limited blood supply<\/span>4<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. Fracture displacement:<\/b> <\/span> Displaced fractures are more likely to disrupt blood flow and have a higher risk of nonunion<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. Delayed diagnosis and treatment:<\/b> <\/span> Delays in diagnosis and treatment can significantly increase the risk of nonunion<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. Smoking:<\/b> <\/span> Smoking impairs bone healing and increases the risk of nonunion<\/span>17<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n
              5. Patient factors:<\/b> <\/span> Age, overall health, and compliance with treatment can also influence the risk of nonunion.<\/span><\/li>\n
              6. Degree of fracture displacement:<\/b> <\/span> The greater the displacement, the higher the risk of nonunion<\/span>18<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n
              7. Presence of scaphoid AVN:<\/b> <\/span> AVN further compromises the blood supply and increases the risk of nonunion<\/span>18<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Spontaneous union of scaphoid fractures, while rare, has been reported, typically occurring in children<\/span>17<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Complications of Nonunion<\/b> <\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n\n

                Scaphoid nonunion can lead to several complications, including:<\/span><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Avascular necrosis (AVN):<\/b> <\/span> AVN occurs when the blood supply to the proximal pole is disrupted, leading to bone death<\/span>4<\/sup><\/span>. It can cause pain, weakness, and eventual collapse of the bone.<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. Scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC):<\/b> <\/span> SNAC is a progressive degenerative condition that develops in untreated scaphoid nonunions<\/span>17<\/sup><\/span>. It leads to wrist instability, deformity, and arthritis. The most common carpal instability pattern is scapholunate dissociation<\/span>10<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. Osteoarthritis:<\/b> <\/span> Nonunion can disrupt the normal mechanics of the wrist, leading to abnormal wear and tear and eventually osteoarthritis<\/span>19<\/sup><\/span>. This can cause pain, stiffness, and decreased range of motion.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Importance of Prompt Treatment<\/b> <\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n\n

                  Prompt diagnosis and treatment of scaphoid fractures are essential to minimize the risk of nonunion and long-term complications. Early intervention, whether surgical or non-surgical, aims to stabilize the fracture, promote healing, and restore wrist function<\/span>20<\/sup><\/span>. Delays in treatment can lead to increased healing time, higher nonunion rates, and a greater likelihood of developing AVN and osteoarthritis<\/span>21<\/sup><\/span>. Recovery time for scaphoid fractures can vary depending on factors such as the severity of the fracture, the individual’s age, and whether they smoke<\/span>20<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Guidelines for Management<\/b> <\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n\n

                  Several medical societies and organizations provide guidelines for the management of scaphoid fractures. These guidelines emphasize the importance of early diagnosis, appropriate imaging, and individualized treatment based on fracture characteristics and patient factors<\/span>22<\/sup><\/span>. Some key recommendations include:<\/span><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. In cases of suspected scaphoid fracture where initial radiographs are negative, a supplementary MRI or CT should be carried out within 3-5 days<\/span>22<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. Fracture classification, assessment of dislocation, and evaluation of fracture healing are best done on CT with reconstructions in the coronal and sagittal planes, following the longitudinal axis of the scaphoid<\/span>22<\/sup><\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Synthesis<\/b> <\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n\n

                    Scaphoid fractures are common wrist injuries that require prompt and accurate diagnosis and management to prevent long-term complications. These fractures often occur due to falls onto an outstretched hand and can be challenging to diagnose due to their subtle presentation on initial X-rays. Advanced imaging techniques like CT scans and MRI play a crucial role in confirming the diagnosis and assessing fracture characteristics. Treatment strategies range from non-surgical immobilization with casts or splints for stable fractures to surgical interventions like percutaneous screw fixation, ORIF, and bone grafting for unstable or displaced fractures.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    A significant concern in scaphoid fracture management is the risk of nonunion, which can lead to complications such as avascular necrosis, scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC), and osteoarthritis. These complications can cause chronic pain, wrist instability, and decreased range of motion, ultimately affecting an individual’s quality of life. Therefore, early diagnosis and prompt treatment are paramount in ensuring optimal outcomes and minimizing the long-term consequences of scaphoid fractures. Adherence to established guidelines and individualized treatment plans based on fracture characteristics and patient factors are essential for successful management.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Works cited<\/b><\/span><\/h4>\n\n

                    1. Scaphoid Wrist Fracture – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/books\/NBK536907\/<\/a><\/p>\n

                    2. Bilateral Scaphoid Fractures: A Systematic Literature Review – PMC, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC11051215\/<\/a><\/p>\n

                    3. Mayo classification of scaphoid fractures | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/radiopaedia.org\/articles\/mayo-classification-of-scaphoid-fractures?lang=us<\/a><\/p>\n

                    4. Treatment of Scaphoid Fractures and Nonunions – PMC, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC4405116\/<\/a><\/p>\n

                    5. Classifications for fractures of carpal bones – AO Surgery Reference, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/surgeryreference.aofoundation.org\/orthopedic-trauma\/adult-trauma\/carpal-bones\/further-reading\/classifications-for-fractures-of-carpal-bones<\/a><\/p>\n

                    6. Scaphoid Fracture – Hand – Orthobullets, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/www.orthobullets.com\/hand\/6034\/scaphoid-fracture<\/a><\/p>\n

                    7. Scaphoid Fracture Nonunion – Hand – Orthobullets, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/www.orthobullets.com\/hand\/422868\/scaphoid-fracture-nonunion<\/a><\/p>\n

                    8. Scaphoid fracture | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/radiopaedia.org\/articles\/scaphoid-fracture?lang=us<\/a><\/p>\n

                    9. Scaphoid Fracture of the Wrist – OrthoInfo – AAOS, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/orthoinfo.aaos.org\/en\/diseases–conditions\/scaphoid-fracture-of-the-wrist\/<\/a><\/p>\n

                    10. Scaphoid Fracture Imaging: Practice Essentials, Radiography, Computed Tomography, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/emedicine.medscape.com\/article\/397230-overview<\/a><\/p>\n

                    11. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of scaphoid fractures – PMC, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC6399182\/<\/a><\/p>\n

                    12. Utilising magnetic resonance imaging as the gold standard in management of suspected scaphoid fractures in the emergency department setting – Irish Medical Journal, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/imj.ie\/utilising-magnetic-resonance-imaging-as-the-gold-standard-in-management-of-suspected-scaphoid-fractures-in-the-emergency-department-setting\/<\/a><\/p>\n

                    13. Conservative interventions for treating scaphoid fractures in adults …, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC6513536\/<\/a><\/p>\n

                    14. Treatments for Scaphoid Fracture Nonunion – The Institute for Advanced Reconstruction, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/www.advancedreconstruction.com\/hand-upper-extremity\/what-we-treat\/scaphoid-fracture-nonunion\/<\/a><\/p>\n

                    15. Clinically SUspected ScaPhoid fracturE: treatment with supportive bandage or CasT? ‘Study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial’ (SUSPECT study) | BMJ Open, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/content\/10\/9\/e036998<\/a><\/p>\n

                    16. Scaphoid Fracture Treatment Louisville | Avascular Necrosis Treatment KY, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/www.orthopedicandsportsspecialists.com\/scaphoid-fracture-andrew-louis-degruccio-md.html<\/a><\/p>\n

                    17. Spontaneous union of neglected proximal pole scaphoid fracture: A case report – Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/journalmsr.com\/spontaneous-union-of-neglected-proximal-pole-scaphoid-fracture-a-case-report\/<\/a><\/p>\n

                    18. Treatment of failed scaphoid nonunion fixation using free medial femoral condyle vascularized bone grafting | SICOT-J, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/www.sicot-j.org\/articles\/sicotj\/full_html\/2023\/01\/sicotj230008\/sicotj230008.html<\/a><\/p>\n

                    19. Scaphoid Injuries and Conditions (Wrist Injuries) – HSS, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/www.hss.edu\/condition-list_scaphoid-injuries-wrist-pain.asp<\/a><\/p>\n

                    20. Scaphoid fracture: Treatment, symptoms, and recovery – MedicalNewsToday, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/www.medicalnewstoday.com\/articles\/scaphoid-fracture<\/a><\/p>\n

                    21. Scaphoid Fracture – Access Ortho, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/www.accessortho.com.au\/scaphoid-fracture\/<\/a><\/p>\n

                    22. Acute scaphoid fractures: guidelines for diagnosis and treatment – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC7047900\/<\/a><\/p>\n

                    23. Scaphoid fractures – The British Society for Surgery of the Hand, accessed February 17, 2025, https:\/\/www.bssh.ac.uk\/_userfiles\/pages\/files\/professionals\/Trauma%20standards\/Scaphoid%20standards.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                    Scaphoid Fracture: Diagnosis, Management, and the Importance of Prompt Treatment Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal bone fractures, representing 60-70% of all carpal bone fractures and 2-7% of all fractures1. In the United States, the incidence rate is 1.47 per 100,000 person-years2. They typically occur in young, active individuals, with a higher incidence in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5464,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[531],"tags":[930,932,333,933,725,817,928,931,680,929],"class_list":["post-5465","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hand-upper-extremity-restoring-function-and-dexterity","tag-avascular-necrosis","tag-carpal-bones","tag-diagnosis","tag-immobilization","tag-management","tag-nonunion","tag-scaphoid-fracture","tag-snac","tag-surgical-treatment","tag-wrist-injury"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthogate.org\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5465","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthogate.org\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthogate.org\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthogate.org\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthogate.org\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5465"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthogate.org\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5465\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthogate.org\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5464"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthogate.org\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5465"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthogate.org\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5465"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthogate.org\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5465"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}