I am just wondering if there ended up being an open spot after the match,and if so, where it was.
Thanks.
ucla-harbor said during the interview that they only rank 15 people out of all those that they interview. i was surprised to hear this because it's not thought of as the most lucrative place to end up... if they only ranked 15 like they said, i can see why they'd end up with one spot unfilled.If this is true, and they actually DO rank only 15 people, then it's absolutely well deserved!!!
it looks like a surprisingly large number of the top applicants this year didn't match for some reason. i really feel for you guys, because i heard that some places picked people based on factors that don't necessarily seem fair. for example, i heard through the grape vine that HSS took a couple of people that were basically connected but well below average applicants. i'm sure other places probably do this as well, which hurts the qualified folks that don't match.I don't necessarily disagree, but who's to say that the people who matched aren't as qualified...based on what? A lower Step 1 score? Less interview offers? No AOA? No offense to anybody in particular but from following some threads on this board, it seems like some people fluff themselves based on "measurables" which are not meant to measure potential as an orthopaedic resident at all. I've never been to HSS, but they seem to be doing something right...
Well hearing the fact that Harbor was left with an open space absolutly enrages me. I rotated there this past fall and I didn't even get an interview. The place is a true sh#& hole, but a great way to get back to Los Angeles. I know the prelim they took. He is a great guy, and a DOI don't know...maybe they picked up on your ambivalence towards their place? If they knew what they had in their redshirt DO intern and they liked him better than all but 15 people they interviewed, not matching a spot probably wasn't a big deal to them. Scouting applicants is an inexact science, so I wouldn't blame them for going with a proven commodity over a bunch of guys who see their program as a fallback option/consolation prize.
I don't necessarily disagree, but who's to say that the people who matched aren't as qualified...based on what? A lower Step 1 score? Less interview offers? No AOA? No offense to anybody in particular but from following some threads on this board, it seems like some people fluff themselves based on "measurables" which are not meant to measure potential as an orthopaedic resident at all. I've never been to HSS, but they seem to be doing something right...THANK YOU!! I totally understand everyone's emotions getting the best of them upon receiving bad news at this most critical juncture of our careers. However I don't think the anger should be misplaced at people who matched. Its not fair to them nor to the programs that took them. If you have to be angry at someone, be angry at the ACGME and the ortho RRC specifically for not allowing more spots at programs. Most programs that I know have more than enough volume and would LOVE to have more help in the form of residents, but for some reason (most likely to keep the demand of attending surgeons high and therefore pushing salaries higher) they do not grow the number of residency spots. In the last 5 years there have been only 2 new programs, one of which already had a residency that the ACGME shut down and they re-opened it, the other was Marshall University. I believe the Banner program is a 3rd, however I'm not sure about the details surrounding that program. From last year to this year the number of spots only increased by 5. So interpret those facts as you will. But if you need to put down those that matched in order to feel good about yourself, well, that shows a lot about your character...
Been wanted to ask this since monday but waited a few days. The people who are not matching on the seem to have numbers, research etc well that would place them at the top of the application pool for the most part. What is the reason(s) they truly dont match. Is it they interview poorly, maybe coming across cocky and arrogant which i understand(a little bit) with the paper applications some have presented on this site. Do they simply not apply to enough programs and just have hopes for places like HSS, NYU, Mayo, Pitt etc. Not meaning to take a shot at anyone who didnt match because i cant imagine how you feel right now. Just curious to know what some people think. thanksYou're not going to find an answer to this question, because there is none. In highly sought after specialties, sometimes highly qualified people get left out. It's just the way it is.
Very well said KneeMD and ArthroscopicSpine above. The measurable qualifiers get way too much credit. I doubt by the end of the an individuals residency people look back to Scores, AOA status etc and say 'I knew he would be great.' HSS is doing awesome and the 'less qualified' individuals they select possess intangibles that they are good at picking up. I'm sure there are kick ass residents around the country that did not have these things, and in the end their actual performance is all that matters. It sucks not to match, but congratulate those that may be your future colleagues if things work well for you the second time around.I don't necessarily disagree, but who's to say that the people who matched aren't as qualified...based on what? A lower Step 1 score? Less interview offers? No AOA? No offense to anybody in particular but from following some threads on this board, it seems like some people fluff themselves based on "measurables" which are not meant to measure potential as an orthopaedic resident at all. I've never been to HSS, but they seem to be doing something right...THANK YOU!! I totally understand everyone's emotions getting the best of them upon receiving bad news at this most critical juncture of our careers. However I don't think the anger should be misplaced at people who matched. Its not fair to them nor to the programs that took them. If you have to be angry at someone, be angry at the ACGME and the ortho RRC specifically for not allowing more spots at programs. Most programs that I know have more than enough volume and would LOVE to have more help in the form of residents, but for some reason (most likely to keep the demand of attending surgeons high and therefore pushing salaries higher) they do not grow the number of residency spots. In the last 5 years there have been only 2 new programs, one of which already had a residency that the ACGME shut down and they re-opened it, the other was Marshall University. I believe the Banner program is a 3rd, however I'm not sure about the details surrounding that program. From last year to this year the number of spots only increased by 5. So interpret those facts as you will. But if you need to put down those that matched in order to feel good about yourself, well, that shows a lot about your character...